Evidence: The Stopwatch Test

← Back to the main Geek Mode article

What was tested: a single, simple request for a working, clickable stopwatch, given to Gemini 3.8 Flash (Flash Extended) and GPT-5.6 Sol (Extra High) in early September 2026. Outcome: Gemini answered with code to save and run separately. ChatGPT delivered a working stopwatch directly in the conversation.

The exact prompt

Make me a stopwatch so I can click start and stop on in this window with working buttons.

Gemini’s response

Gemini gave a perfectly reasonable block of HTML, CSS and JavaScript, followed by instructions to save it as an HTML file and open it in a browser. The code itself was fine. It simply was not what was asked for — a stopwatch usable right there in the window.

Gemini response instructing the user to save HTML and open it in a browser
Gemini’s response: HTML code plus instructions to save and open it separately.

ChatGPT’s response

ChatGPT initially said it couldn’t guarantee that arbitrary live controls could run directly inside the conversation, then provided a working stopwatch anyway — Start, Stop, Reset and Lap buttons that worked right there, plus the HTML file as a backup.

ChatGPT working stopwatch shown directly in the chat interface
ChatGPT’s working stopwatch, usable directly in the chat.

Takeaway

Gemini answered the programming question. ChatGPT solved the problem. Knowing how to make something is not the same as actually completing the job — a distinction that shows up repeatedly across these tests.

← Back to the main Geek Mode article · Next: image generation and UI editing →